
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — A Minnesota jury awarded $65.5 million on Friday to a mother of three who claimed talcum products made by Johnson & Johnson exposed her to asbestos and contributed to her developing cancer in the lining of her lungs.
Jurors determined that plaintiff Anna Jean Houghton Carley, 37, should be compensated by Johnson & Johnson after using its baby powder throughout her childhood and later developing mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer caused primarily by exposure to the carcinogen asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson said it would appeal the verdict.
During a 13-day trial in Ramsey County District Court, Carley's legal team argued the pharmaceutical giant sold and marketed talc-based products to consumers despite knowing it can be contaminated with asbestos. Carley's lawyers also said her family was never warned about potential dangers while using the product on their child. The product was taken off shelves in the U.S. in 2020.
“This case was not about compensation only. It was about truth and accountability," Carley's attorney Ben Braly said.
Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for Johnson & Johnson, argued the company's baby powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer. He expects an appellate court to reverse the decision.
The verdict is the latest development in a longstanding legal battle over claims that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder was connected to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, which strikes the lungs and other organs. Johnson & Johnson stopped selling powder made with talc worldwide in 2023.
“These lawsuits are predicated on ‘junk science,’ refuted by decades of studies that demonstrate Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer,” Haas said in a statement after the verdict.
Earlier this month, a Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million to two women who claimed Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. And in October, another California jury ordered the company to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died of mesothelioma, claiming she developed the cancer because the baby powder she used was contaminated with asbestos.
latest_posts
- 1
Day to day Temporary Positions That Compensate Fairly in the US - 2
IDF destroys Hamas shaft in northern Gaza with loaded 'ready to fire' rocket aimed at Sderot - 3
Former GLP-1 users regain lost weight after about 18 months, study says - 4
Trump administration plan to reduce access to some student loans angers nurses, health care groups - 5
NASA's Perseverance Mars rover could break the record for miles driven on another planet
Fact Check: Some Bridge Photos Circulating Do NOT Show The Hongqi Bridge That Collapsed In Southwest China Nov. 11, 2025
Favored Organic product for Seniors' Prosperity: Make Your Determination
A Manual for SUVs with Less Noteworthy Gas Mileage
Empathy and reasoning aren’t rivals – new research shows they work together to drive people to help more
Tracking down the Right Equilibrium: Charges versus Personal Costs in Senior Protection.
Manual for Financial plan Agreeable PC
As reefs vanish, assisted coral fertilization offers hope in the Dominican Republic
New law puts familiar drinks, creams and gummies in legal limbo
Sexual violence is being used as a weapon in Sudan's war, doctors group says













